Member-only story
Navigating Ambiguity: The US Approach to Post-2021 Afghanistan
“This is quite a game, politics. There are no permanent enemies, and no permanent friends, only permanent interests” William Clay
In the post-2021 Afghanistan landscape, the United States appears to be employing a strategy of strategic ambiguity in its relationship with the Taliban. Strategic ambiguity refers to the intentional use of vagueness and uncertainty in communication and actions to achieve specific objectives. It allows for flexibility, the deterrence of adversaries, and advantages in negotiations by keeping information open to interpretation.
Through strategic ambiguity, the United States aims to navigate the complex dynamics of the situation while maintaining leverage and avoiding a clear commitment to a specific course of action. One prominent example of US strategic ambiguity is the Taiwan issue. US strategic ambiguity in Taiwan refers to the deliberate policy of maintaining ambiguity regarding the extent of the United States’ commitment to Taiwan’s defense and sovereignty. The United States, under its One-China Policy, officially recognizes the government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China, including Taiwan. However, the United States also maintains unofficial relations with…
